Hvad laver FN?
Jeg er i gang med at lave en opgave om FN. Jeg kunne godt tænke mig at vide hvad i syntes om FN.
Hvis i læser det, kunne i så ikke være søde at svarer🙂Tak
Hvis i læser det, kunne i så ikke være søde at svarer🙂Tak
FN er ikke godt.
Jeg er syndes at FN er noget lort. Jeg kommer fra et land i afrika hvor der er FN soldter og efter min mening er der ikke sket noget. Så min holdning til FN er at det er noget LORT.🙁
En fornuftig start.
Sådan lidt historisk:
Efter første verdenskrig var det internationale samfund noget chokeret over, at der for første gang var flere civile tab under en krig end der var tab af soldater.
Der blev stablet et internationalt forum på benene ved Versaille-freden kaldet Folkenes Forbund. Det viste sig ikke at kunne leve op til forventningerne - betegnelsen en kolos på lerfødder passer sikkert meget godt. "FF" kunne ikke forhindre 2. verdenskrig og blev opløst.
Efter 2. verdenskrig blev der gjort et nyt forsøg med Forenede Nationer. Det har også haft en vaklende start, men er på det seneste begyndt at få lidt mere rygrad.
Problemerne med FN er dels,
at en mænde nationer er bagud med "foreningskontingentet", sikkert fordi de ikke regner FN for noget særtligt - USA har tradition for at være meget fodslæbende med betalingerne
dels, at konstruktionen med sikkerhedsrådet og veto-retten til de faste medlemmer har gjort, at USA - Sovjetunionen (nu Rusland) - Kina har holdt hunanden i skak og forhindret diverse vedtagelser ud fra hver deres synspunkter
og dels, at mange beslutninger ikke er blevet overholdt.
F.eks. har Yassir Arafat (palæstinenser) bjæffet op i mange år over, at Israel ikke overholdt resolution 242 - det gør Israel stadig ikke.
USA valgte at invadere Irak i 2003, selv om FN ikke havde taget en beslutning om det.
Rusland invaderede diverse vasalstater i hele perioden op til nu (med mere eller mindre held) uden at respektere FN.
FN i dag er langt mere end en sikkerhedspolitisk interesseorganisation. Der er "afdelinger" på alle mulige og umulige områder, f.eks. sundhed (WHO), landbrug (FAO) uddannelse (UNESCO) og mange mange flere.
Den sikkerhedsmæssige side af FN er under pres med mellemrum, f.eks. lige nu. Men jeg tvivler på at nogen kan forestille sig, at de andre afdelinger skulle lukke.
Efter første verdenskrig var det internationale samfund noget chokeret over, at der for første gang var flere civile tab under en krig end der var tab af soldater.
Der blev stablet et internationalt forum på benene ved Versaille-freden kaldet Folkenes Forbund. Det viste sig ikke at kunne leve op til forventningerne - betegnelsen en kolos på lerfødder passer sikkert meget godt. "FF" kunne ikke forhindre 2. verdenskrig og blev opløst.
Efter 2. verdenskrig blev der gjort et nyt forsøg med Forenede Nationer. Det har også haft en vaklende start, men er på det seneste begyndt at få lidt mere rygrad.
Problemerne med FN er dels,
at en mænde nationer er bagud med "foreningskontingentet", sikkert fordi de ikke regner FN for noget særtligt - USA har tradition for at være meget fodslæbende med betalingerne
dels, at konstruktionen med sikkerhedsrådet og veto-retten til de faste medlemmer har gjort, at USA - Sovjetunionen (nu Rusland) - Kina har holdt hunanden i skak og forhindret diverse vedtagelser ud fra hver deres synspunkter
og dels, at mange beslutninger ikke er blevet overholdt.
F.eks. har Yassir Arafat (palæstinenser) bjæffet op i mange år over, at Israel ikke overholdt resolution 242 - det gør Israel stadig ikke.
USA valgte at invadere Irak i 2003, selv om FN ikke havde taget en beslutning om det.
Rusland invaderede diverse vasalstater i hele perioden op til nu (med mere eller mindre held) uden at respektere FN.
FN i dag er langt mere end en sikkerhedspolitisk interesseorganisation. Der er "afdelinger" på alle mulige og umulige områder, f.eks. sundhed (WHO), landbrug (FAO) uddannelse (UNESCO) og mange mange flere.
Den sikkerhedsmæssige side af FN er under pres med mellemrum, f.eks. lige nu. Men jeg tvivler på at nogen kan forestille sig, at de andre afdelinger skulle lukke.
hvad laver FN
En levende Muppet Show. Ikke noget andet.
Den grønne frø
Kermit lig med grøn landbrugs- og klimapolitik
eller de to gamle gnavpotter lig med sundhedspolitik
eller den svenske chef lig med fødevare- og landbrugspolitik
eller præcist hvad i FN minder dig om Muppets ?
[l][s][s][l]
eller de to gamle gnavpotter lig med sundhedspolitik
eller den svenske chef lig med fødevare- og landbrugspolitik
eller præcist hvad i FN minder dig om Muppets ?
[l][s][s][l]
hvad mener du?
mener du det på en negativ måde eller positiv måde? da vi skal bruge det til en opgave.😉
Dub FX
Making me look at the news as if its one big conspiracy
I see the truth an I feel the lies
But so many different views in so many different eyes
Make us paralysed, where all so hypnotized
From all the fluorides and chem. trails up in the skies
They want to dumb us down just because they’re scared of us
They know that if we band together we can rise above
They feed us lies on the telly cos so many trust
That the UN’s agenda actually cares about us
But I know better, you see it’s all about to end
A worldwide suicide fashion trend
We like to look pretty and we want to all pretend
But the truth is something nobody can comprehend
-Dub FX
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."
by:
Henry Kissinger
(1923- ) Former US Secretary of State
There it is, folks. Let it be known that the true intent of the UN is a non-elected world government. And everything is going as planned...
-- Chicago
“If the United Nations once admits that international disputes can be settled by using force, then we will have destroyed the foundation of the organization and our best hope of establishing a world order.”
Dwight David Eisenhower
“I don't think any one person or any one organization should have the final word. That being said, I am working for a better United Nations. Nothing is perfect. You should never rely on only one source, but rather rely on those you believe in the most.”
Angelina Jolie
Douglas Casey, quotes about UN:
Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
Quote from Episcopal Church General Convention
"The term “Internationalism” has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a “League of Nations” or a “Federated Union” to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the “New International Order,” “The New World Order,” “World Union Now,” “World Commonwealth of Nations,” “World Community,” etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual."
Quote by:
Episcopal Church General Convention
Source:
Excerpt from “A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention,” October 1940
I see the truth an I feel the lies
But so many different views in so many different eyes
Make us paralysed, where all so hypnotized
From all the fluorides and chem. trails up in the skies
They want to dumb us down just because they’re scared of us
They know that if we band together we can rise above
They feed us lies on the telly cos so many trust
That the UN’s agenda actually cares about us
But I know better, you see it’s all about to end
A worldwide suicide fashion trend
We like to look pretty and we want to all pretend
But the truth is something nobody can comprehend
-Dub FX
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."
by:
Henry Kissinger
(1923- ) Former US Secretary of State
There it is, folks. Let it be known that the true intent of the UN is a non-elected world government. And everything is going as planned...
-- Chicago
“If the United Nations once admits that international disputes can be settled by using force, then we will have destroyed the foundation of the organization and our best hope of establishing a world order.”
Dwight David Eisenhower
“I don't think any one person or any one organization should have the final word. That being said, I am working for a better United Nations. Nothing is perfect. You should never rely on only one source, but rather rely on those you believe in the most.”
Angelina Jolie
Douglas Casey, quotes about UN:
Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
Quote from Episcopal Church General Convention
"The term “Internationalism” has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a “League of Nations” or a “Federated Union” to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the “New International Order,” “The New World Order,” “World Union Now,” “World Commonwealth of Nations,” “World Community,” etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual."
Quote by:
Episcopal Church General Convention
Source:
Excerpt from “A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention,” October 1940
FN er
Antisemitisk:
http://zioneocon.blogspot.com/cartoon%20condemning%20israel.jpg
Utroværdigt:
http://www.berlingske.dk/verden/gaddafi-skal-vogte-menneskerettigheder
Racistisk:
http://ordoesit.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/sudangenocide.jpg
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/anti-semitism.gif
http://www.middle-east-info.org/gateway/unitednations/UN-cartoon.gif
For nu blot at nævne 3 oplagte forhold 😉
http://zioneocon.blogspot.com/cartoon%20condemning%20israel.jpg
Utroværdigt:
http://www.berlingske.dk/verden/gaddafi-skal-vogte-menneskerettigheder
Racistisk:
http://ordoesit.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/sudangenocide.jpg
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/anti-semitism.gif
http://www.middle-east-info.org/gateway/unitednations/UN-cartoon.gif
For nu blot at nævne 3 oplagte forhold 😉
Min mening om FN.
jeg synes Fn er noget lort, de spulere alle mine planer. Ps jeg elsker at gå den i røven af anders fogh