Polygami er godt for høj-status mænd og lav-status kvinder
Morgen i chatten,
fandt en artikel på nettet der omhandler polygami, dens fordele og ulemper, en fin artikel, har ikke læst dens lige endnu og den forklare stort set hvordan og hvorfor vores samfundet ser ud som det gør og hvad fremtiden kan bringe hvis vi ikke passer på...hvis du har interesse i emnet rådes det stærkt herfra at du læser den...du er velkommen til at kommentere hvis du finder det nødvendigt.
http://www.snappingturtle.net/jmc/tmblog/archives/005331.html
Indledningen:
""The Advantages of Polygamy
I've long worried about the problem of marriage, that the reasons for it being what it is have long been untaught, unexamined by society. This made any defense of marriage hollow because we really hadn't worked out why the thing was useful to start with.
There was one exception I encountered pretty early on in my own life, a long ago (1993, I now know) magazine article in an issue devoted to the subject whose cover was "How Polygamy is Good for High-Status Men and Low-Status Women". For an influential conservative magazine, that was awfully provocative and it did its job. I've remembered that title line for over a decade.
I finally got around to finding the darned thing.
By special arrangement with National Review, I've gotten permission to reprint that article. Without further ado, here is "Monogamy and its discontents; challenge to western sexual values" by William Tucker.""
saintan
fandt en artikel på nettet der omhandler polygami, dens fordele og ulemper, en fin artikel, har ikke læst dens lige endnu og den forklare stort set hvordan og hvorfor vores samfundet ser ud som det gør og hvad fremtiden kan bringe hvis vi ikke passer på...hvis du har interesse i emnet rådes det stærkt herfra at du læser den...du er velkommen til at kommentere hvis du finder det nødvendigt.
http://www.snappingturtle.net/jmc/tmblog/archives/005331.html
Indledningen:
""The Advantages of Polygamy
I've long worried about the problem of marriage, that the reasons for it being what it is have long been untaught, unexamined by society. This made any defense of marriage hollow because we really hadn't worked out why the thing was useful to start with.
There was one exception I encountered pretty early on in my own life, a long ago (1993, I now know) magazine article in an issue devoted to the subject whose cover was "How Polygamy is Good for High-Status Men and Low-Status Women". For an influential conservative magazine, that was awfully provocative and it did its job. I've remembered that title line for over a decade.
I finally got around to finding the darned thing.
By special arrangement with National Review, I've gotten permission to reprint that article. Without further ado, here is "Monogamy and its discontents; challenge to western sexual values" by William Tucker.""
saintan