Er danske JV'ere ikke Rimelige og................................
.................fornuftige, efter nedenstående at dømme må svaret være Nej!
Nedenstående stod at læse i ”Vågn Op” 02-10-1973 - side 6.
Fornuftige / Rimelige Personer er enige om, at den eneste fair måde er, at undersøge beviserne på begge side, Både for og imod i en diskutabel sag.
Det er måden at komme til Sandheden!
(Awake, Oct. 22, 1973, page 6)
Resten må I selv oversætte!
/*/*/*/*/*/*/*
How can somebody know if this organization is speaking for God? The Jehovah Witnesses give us the answer to this very question.
“Can there be false religion? It is not a form of religious persecution for anyone to say and to show that another religion is false. It is not religious persecution for an informed person to expose publicly a certain religion as being false, thus allowing persons to see the difference between false religion and true religion.” (Watchtower, Nov. 15, 1963, page 688)
“Reasonable persons agree that the only fair method is to examine the evidence on both sides, both for and against a disputed theory. That is how one arrives at the truth.” (Awake, Oct. 22, 1973, page 6)
Med venlig hilsen
jalmar
Nedenstående stod at læse i ”Vågn Op” 02-10-1973 - side 6.
Fornuftige / Rimelige Personer er enige om, at den eneste fair måde er, at undersøge beviserne på begge side, Både for og imod i en diskutabel sag.
Det er måden at komme til Sandheden!
(Awake, Oct. 22, 1973, page 6)
Resten må I selv oversætte!
/*/*/*/*/*/*/*
How can somebody know if this organization is speaking for God? The Jehovah Witnesses give us the answer to this very question.
“Can there be false religion? It is not a form of religious persecution for anyone to say and to show that another religion is false. It is not religious persecution for an informed person to expose publicly a certain religion as being false, thus allowing persons to see the difference between false religion and true religion.” (Watchtower, Nov. 15, 1963, page 688)
“Reasonable persons agree that the only fair method is to examine the evidence on both sides, both for and against a disputed theory. That is how one arrives at the truth.” (Awake, Oct. 22, 1973, page 6)
Med venlig hilsen
jalmar