Jeg vil tage mit udgangspunkt i følgende:
Romerne kap. 1 vers 20:
”Thi hans usynlige Væsen, både hans evige Kraft og Guddommelighed, skues fra Verdens Skabelse af, idet det forstås af hans Gerninger, ”
Hvilket jo handler om:
Guds person?
Guds beskaffenhed?
Guds identifikation? og dermed også mennesket – hvem vi er?
_______________________________________________________
1. Mosebog skriver historien (Moses) fra tiden 3.500 år før vor tidsregning (f. kr.), at ”tehemoth” var ”- det der ikke var” og …………… ”Guds Ånd svævede over ”vandene” ”?
I så fald, eksisterede intet af det som vi kender til i dag og det gjorde vi så heller ikke.
______________________________________________
Dersom vi går lidt videre i den konkrete verden; hvor vi er og hvis du ser på mennesket (et menneske) er det meget svært at forestille sig, at et levende menneske engang ikke var.
Hvis man så begynder at gå tilbage i dette menneskes ”tid” (levetid) kommer man til det øjeblik hvor forplantningen indtraf, et befrugtet æg.
Det er næsten lige som alle andre dyr. Nu mener jeg ikke at et menneske er et dyr, sådan som vi ellers betragter og kategorisere et dyr, men rent molekylært, er det.
Det vil sige, at atomerne og molekylerne er ens, altså de samme. ”Byggematerialet” er det samme og ligeledes ”livsånden”; det der får atomerne og molekylerne til at samarbejde og danne den materie, som med tiden udvikler sig og bliver til enten et menneske, et dyr eller planter.
Det der gør forskellen er ”koderne i atomerne og molekylerne”.
I dette tilfælde er det koderne i molekylerne der er det afgørende. Altså, DNA har et kodet informations ”bibliotek” der så a sige ”giver besked til hvad og hvornår”.
Kan vi blive enige om dette?
Ok, men nu er der så ingen der har indflydelse på hvordan og hvorledes og hvornår ”det” indtræffer, at cellerne gør som de skal for at et menneske kan dannes. Det sker helt automatisk.
Første celle deler sig, næste ligeså og så fremdeles og når der er tilstrækkelige celler der har dannet det de er kodet til, begynder de at udvikle enten organerne eller formen eller udseendet, slutresultatet.
Ingen har rørt ved noget og ingen har haft indflydelse på hvordan det kunne foregå. Hvordan kan det så lade sig gøre, af sig selv?
Der er kun én eneste mulighed.
Elektricitet og kemi.
____________________________________________________
Se, jeg vil lige komme med en indskudt bemærkning.
Der findes troende (helst Kristne) og så findes der ateister, men vi Kristne sondre mellem videnskab og tro (Bibelen – Kristendommen).
Det betyder, at vi anerkender begge og vi forholder os til begge, men troen gør at vi mener, at på sigt vil både videnskaben og troen bekræfte hinanden.
Her vil jeg så komme med noget (det sidste nye) der også kan være med til at lukke øjnene op og samtidig bekræfte overfor dig, at de ting jeg skriver (giver dig) er sande og konkrete og frem for alt; videnskabelige.
________________________________________________________
Her vil jeg så citere (på Engelsk) det jeg vil give dig og senere vil vi så diskutere det og jeg vil fortælle hvad jeg får ud af det.
Først citatet: Date: 06 September 2012 Time: 04:37 PM ET
A giant leap has just been taken in humanity's understanding of itself. That leap is called ENCODE. Here's what you need to know.
Eleven years ago, scientists sequenced the human genome. That is, they unraveled the spirals of DNA packed inside the nucleus of each of our cells and figured out the ordering of its 3.3 billion chemical "base pairs," or the molecular letters, of sorts, that spell out instructions for the cells to follow.
But although the Human Genome Project (as the endeavor was called) established the order of the base pairs, most of the code that these letters spelled out remained encrypted.
Scientists could see that roughly 23,000 sections of the genome, made up of about 1,000 base pairs each, coded for proteins.
In other words, these sections, called genes, were structured in such a way that cells could read them off to build protein molecules, which then performed cellular functions.
But the genes made up less than 2 percent of the total human genome. What did the rest of the endless spirals of DNA base pairs mean? Many scientists thought most of it was useless gobbledygook left over from our evolutionary past. They called it "junk DNA."
[How to Speak Genetics: A Glossary]
Now, an international collaboration of 442 scientists has unveiled the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements, nicknamed ENCODE.
In more than two dozen articles published in Nature, Science and other journals, the scientists present nine years of research showing that genes are just one element of a long "parts list" that makes up the human genome.
Rather than being mostly junk, 80 percent of DNA has a function, and ENCODE is the encyclopedia that describes what all of it does.
Half or more of human DNA acts as "gene switches."
These portions of code control when genes turn on and off, affecting how many proteins get built both throughout the day and over the course of a lifetime.
There's a gene switch that tells an undifferentiated cell in an embryo to develop into a liver cell, for example; there's another switch that directs a cell in the pancreas to rev up its insulin production after a meal; and there's another that tells a skin cell it's time to bud off, notes Time Magazine.
"What we learned from ENCODE is how complicated the human genome is, and the incredible choreography that is going on with the immense number of switches that are choreographing how genes are used," Eric Green, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (which ran the nine-year-long ENCODE project), told reporters during a teleconference.
So, why does it matter that we now have an encyclopedia of human DNA?
For one, knowing what so much more of the genetic code actually does, will help pinpoint what makes us human; evolutionary biologists can study how the gene switches, as well as the genes, of Homo sapiens diverged from those of other animals.
More importantly, scientists say the new encyclopedia of DNA will tremendously accelerate our understanding of why diseases occur and how to prevent them. That's because, more often than not, diseases stem from changes that occur in regions of the genetic code formerly labeled "junk."
"Most of the changes that affect disease don't lie in the genes themselves; they lie in the switches," Michael Snyder, an ENCODE researcher based at Stanford University, told The New York Times.
Take cancer. It turns out that most of the changes to DNA that make cells turn cancerous do not occur in genes, but in the portions of DNA that exert control over genes: the switches.
Knowing what these switches do, researchers say they can begin to develop drugs that target the control circuitry, rather than targeting the genes themselves, which, in many cases, are impervious to direct attack.
The ENCODE project "will definitely have an impact on our medical research on cancer," Dr. Mark Rubin, a prostate cancer genomics researcher at Weill Cornell Medical College, told the Times. [What If We Eradicated All Disease?]
Scientists have already found changes to gene switches that appear to usher in the development of multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Crohn's disease, lupus and celiac disease.
Other common diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and depression also fit the profile of conditions that likely result from changes to the way genes get turned on or off, rather than changes to genes themselves.
"By and large, we believe rare diseases may be caused by mutations in the protein [or gene-] coding region" of DNA, Green told reporters, while the "more common, complicated diseases may be traced to genetic changes in the switches."
Common diseases: we're coming for you.
http://www.livescience.com/22990-encode-explanation-facts.html
Platoon